To facilitate a discussion I would make
sure to use open ended questions, which require multiple layers of
thought and encourage help and feedback. For instance, take the
following question: What role does technology have in your
classroom? This question, while open ended, does not allow the
latitude for discussion that you, as an online professor, are hoping
for. You would want to encourage the processing of not only the
learner's usage of tech, but others as well. To do so you change
your question to the following, What role does technology have in
your school? This has more scope, but is too vague as they could
talk about the new metal detectors and or HD CCTV (high definition
closed circuit television) cameras at the school. Whereas this is
technology, it is not INSTRUCTIONAL technology (IT).
How about this one? What role does
instructional technology have in the classrooms at your school?
Better, add to that though. For instance, prompt them to again
assess and analyze the usage so that they can see the do's and
don'ts, pro's and cons, etc. You want them to understand that
technology, though a boon, can be a bane as well, if not applied
properly. SO, What role does instructional technology have in the
classrooms at your school? Discuss, teachers who use it well, don't
use it at all, don't use it enough, use it badly, or over use it.
Here we have given them some talking points which can not only direct
their communication, but their communication as a manifestation of
their deliberate and critical analysis about the instructional
technology in the school. Always remember that learner's
communication is to provide you, the instructor, with a window into
their understanding and mastery or lack thereof regarding the
content, so your questions must always be crafted in a way that
achieves that purpose.
Furthermore, consider this addition:
What role does
instructional technology have in the classrooms at your school?
Discuss, teachers who use it well, don't use it at all, don't use it
enough, use it badly, and/or over use it. What category do you fall
in now? Where do you want to be? After assessing the state of IT at
your school, what realistic goals and time-lines can you set to
improve your own dynamic and inspiring practice? What differences
and similarities do you see between and amongst the other schools
documented by your peers?
This final prompt, I believe, while
asking a lot, will spur not only excellent opportunities for
inter-student communication, but also intra-student communication, by
having the student not only analyze and critique others, but also
themselves. If “we are our own worse critics”, then the
introspection inherent here will make that more productive via
planning for improvement. Additionally, the healthy competition with
others in the building and others in the online course will make an
amazing difference in the learner's class and the school.
Though I took a while to explain my
train of thought in terms of this prompt development, I felt it very
important to model, exactly what I am implying 'good' communication
does for the teacher-student relationship, it begets understanding of
understanding and mastery or the lack thereof. Therefore, I made
sure to document my development of the prompt and my reasoning behind
the changes. Let us all make sure that every time that we
communicate, regardless of the relationship, that we our language is
to convey and transmit a message whether that of love, sorrow,
understanding, struggle, success etc. So it is up to us as
educators to communicate exactly what we want from our students, so
that they have no choice, but to analyze and assimilate, think and
reflect, as well as perform and produce.

